Legal Opinion
FONTANA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. Torres
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 2007No. E038366PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.
1. Introduction
The present appeal concerns the Fontana Redevelopment Agency (Fontana RDA) and the implementation of its redevelopment plan, particularly as it affects its statutory obligation to increase the supply of affordable housing as part of redevelopment. (§ 33071; Lancaster Redevelopment Agency v. Dibley (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1656, 1658-1659 [25 Cal.Rptr.2d 593] (Lancaster).) Ten-Ninety, Ltd., a California limited partnership, the real estate developer of Fontana’s Jurupa Hills Redevelopment Project and a real party in interest, has joined with Fontana RDA.
The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Ontario v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Urban Habitat Program v. City of PleasantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Colonies Partners, L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Macy v. City of FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- City of Cerritos v. CERRITOS TAXPAYERS ASSN.California Court of Appeal · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.