Legal Opinion

South Tahoe Gas Co. v. Hofmann Land Improvement Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1972No. Civ. 27743PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Defendants, a corporation which contracted with plaintiff utility for a gas main extension into a tract it was developing, and a second corporation which guaranteed the former’s liability under that contract, have appealed from a judgment which awarded the utility $8,562 plus interest, representing the charges for the extension at the effective approved rates for such an extension adjusted for allowable refunds. They contend that the contract for the extension was illegal and unenforceable because the utility contracted to charge for the extension at $3.35 per foot when its…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Okun v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Homestead Supplies, Inc. v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Molokoa Village Development Co. v. Kauai Electric Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Empire West v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API