Levinson v. Boas
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. M. B. Kellogg, Francis J. Heney, and C. A. S. Frost, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff is the receiver of the insolvent copartnership of Schumacher & Co. While the firm of Schumacher & Co. was transacting its business as diamond and jewelry merchant one of the members of the firm, on behalf of the firm, at various times borrowed money from the defendant, pledging with him, as security for the loans, diamonds, and other jewels and articles of jewelry. After his. appointment the receiver made demand upon defendant for a restoration and return of the pledges upon the ground that defendant was, and was acting as, a pawnbroker, and that because of his violations of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Coppell v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Bank of Hamilton v. Lessee of DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Miller v. AmmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.