Legal Opinion

Miller v. McKinnon

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1942No. S. F. 16023PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiff, as a citizen resident and taxpayer of Santa Clara County, commenced in his name on behalf of the county, an action against a partnership doing business under the name of Nash Englehardt Silva Mfg. Co., and the members thereof, and certain county officers to recover money claimed by him to have been illegally expended by the county and received by the partnership. He also named the county as a defendant. He appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after demurrers to his fourth amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend.

Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint contains…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API