Legal Opinion

Associated Creditors' Agency v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1975No. S.F. 23118PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J. *

Plaintiff, an assignee of eight creditors who furnished alcoholic beverages and several creditors who furnished provisions and supplies to premises licensed in the name of defendant partners, has appealed from a judgment which denied it any recovery because the concessionaire of the bar and restaurant on the premises, who ordered and received the merchandise, was an independent operator without actual or apparent authority to obligate the licensees. The plaintiff does not seriously question the trial court’s finding that there was no actual agency or authority. It contends…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Walker v. Signal Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. H. Russell Taylor's Fire Prevention Service, Inc. v. Coca Cola Bottling Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Kaplan v. Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API