Legal Opinion

Paquette v. City of Fall River

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 25, 1932PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The plaintiffs are teachers in the public schools of-the defendant. Each had been elected, after preliminary employment for at least three years, to serve at the discretion of the school committee. They had received stated salaries for performance of their duties prior to September, 1930. In that month they returned to their work and performed their duties, receiving the same salary previously paid until April 6, 1931. On April 4, 1931, the school committee voted to reduce the salaries of all teachers by an amount equal to twenty per cent, the reduction to take effect on April 6,1931,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Styria, Scopinich v. MunroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Leonard v. School Committee of the City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. School Committee of the City of Lowell v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Wheelock v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Bolster v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Cowden v. Broderick & Calvert, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. ArantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API