Fidler v. Board of Trustees
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE Pro Tem. McDANIEL Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This is an appeal from a judgment in mandate proceedings. The appellant was petitioner in the trial court, seeking by mandate to compel the respondent Board of Trustees of the Roseville Union High School District, and the members thereof, to admit him to the use and occupation of his right as a permanent teacher, to teach in the respondent Union High School and to pay him the salary to which he claimed to be entitled, under the law, as such teacher. An alternative writ was issued and the respondents and defendants therein filed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leymel v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Grigsby v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Martin v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Buckbee v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Saxton v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Board of Education v. Dresden SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Fry v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Rible v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Pulcifer v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Aebli v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.