Legal Opinion

Kummet v. Thielen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 1941No. 32,651PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This is an action to set aside a transfer of personal property alleged to be fraudulent as to plaintiff.

The complaint alleged that plaintiff was a judgment creditor of the defendant Philip J. Thielen; that he transferred to his wife, the defendant Cora Thielen, the stock of merchandise, fixtures, and furniture which he owned and used in operating a store in Pierz known as Thielen’s Store; and that the transfer was fraudulent as to plaintiff. Judgment was demanded that the transfer was fraud ulent and that the transferred property was subject to levy of execution under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Winchester Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Bolton-Swanby Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Skinner v. OverendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. State Bank v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Sutton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Finn v. Alliance BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Citizens State Bank Norwood Young America v. Gordon BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. In Re ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Ries v. Wintz Properties, Inc. (In Re Wintz Companies)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Haskins v. Certified Escrow & Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API