Legal Opinion
Rutgers Cas. Ins. v. State Farm
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 26, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
234 N.J. Super. 202 (1989)
560 A.2d 722
RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LINDA ROBINSON, LINDA HENNESSEY AND THOMAS COPPOLA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 3, 1989.
Decided June 26, 1989.
Before Judges GAULKIN, R.S. COHEN and A.M. STEIN.
Susan L. Moreinis argued the cause for appellant.
David B. Wright argued the cause for respondent State Farm Mutual (Chierici & Wright, attorneys).
Denise P. Weinstein argued the cause for respondent Linda Hennessey.
The opinion of the court was delivered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Speier Et Ux. v. AylingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Petty v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Parker v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson Matthey Inc. v. PA. MFRS.'ASS'N INS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Hindson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Harleysville Ins. Co. v. Crum & Forster Personal Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Grant v. ThomasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- JULIA MORENO VS. ILEANA LISSETH PULIDO MONTOYA (L-3240-13, L-3303-13 AND L-3327-13, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019