Legal Opinion

Parker v. State Farm Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-1838PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECHTLE, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment in a civil action brought to compel arbitration of plaintiffs’ claims for uninsured motorist benefits allegedly due under two automobile liability insurance policies issued by the defendant. At the heart of defendant’s motion is a question of choice-of-law: whether the policies are governed by Pennsylvania or Maryland law. Because the Court has concluded that Pennsylvania law applies, and that the issues raised by State Farm must accordingly be answered in plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. National Grange Mutual Insurance v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of Rosato v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Providence Washington Insurance v. RosatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. California Casualtly Indemnity Exchange v. PettisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Gould Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance v. MacVicarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API