Petty v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Donald and Betty Petty, residents of California, were injured in an automobile accident. They owned two vehicles registered and insured in California, a state which does not provide no-fault insurance. Even though Donald was driving his daughter’s car in Minnesota at the time of the accident, his policy was applicable because of the priority provisions of Minnesota’s no-fault statute. Pursuant to its interpretation of applicable Minnesota statutes, Allstate paid $10,000 basic economic benefits to Donald, but declined to pay any additional amount which would have been required if…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
3Cited by26 opinions
- Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Toni Brill v. Mid-Century Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Sawyer v. Midland Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.