Legal Opinion
Harleysville Ins. Co. v. Crum & Forster Personal Ins.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 19, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
246 N.J. Super. 503 (1990)
588 A.2d 385
HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CRUM & FORSTER PERSONAL INSURANCE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted November 21, 1990.
Decided December 19, 1990.
Before Judges GAULKIN and HAVEY.
Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys for appellant (Joel N. Werbel, on the brief).
Paul Seligman, attorney for respondent.
2Per curiam
This is a dispute between two insurance carriers concerning their respective liabilities arising out of an automobile accident. On the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, the motion judge…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Castillo v. BickleySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- American Home Assur. Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fd. Bd. v. CliftonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Proformance Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Scott v. SalernoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- American States Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Distler v. Reuther Jeep EagleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Berger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.