Legal Opinion
Speier Et Ux. v. Ayling
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 25, 1945No. Appeals, 167-170PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
Leon Speier and his wife had final judgments on verdicts against Ayling: For the wife for personal injuries $600; for the husband for her expenses $150 and for the loss of her companionship (services) $150; and for Leon Speier $700 for damage to his automobile — a total of $1600. The jury’s verdict established that the negligence of Ayling was the proximate cause of the injury and damages. Ayling at the time was driving Speier’s automobile and Speier was seated by his side.
Upon these judgments each plaintiff issued an attachment execution against Allstate Insurance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Grasberger v. Liebert & Obert, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Sky v. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
3Cited by43 opinions
- American Surety Company of New York, and Cross-Appellee v. Canal Insurance Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. McCabeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Wyatt v. WyattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- American Surety Co. of NY v. American Indem. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.