State ex rel. Bittinger v. NACCO Mining Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Two questions are before us: (1) whether permanent partial disability and impaired earning capacity are the same; and (2) whether the commission, in determining impaired earning capacity, must consider nonmedical disability factors. We answer both questions in the negative.
The first query was conclusively resolved in State, ex rel, Johnson, v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 384, 533 N.E. 2d 775. Johnson held that partial disability does not translate into an equivalent percentage of impaired earning capacity. Absent proof of actual impaired earning capacity, the presence of a partial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Bouchonville v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. CPC Group v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Dickey-Grabler Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Howard v. White-Westinghouse, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Loral Systems Group v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991