Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Howard v. White-Westinghouse, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1990No. 89-300Published

1Per curiam

A claimant has the burden of establishing, by proof of actual impaired earning capacity, an entitlement to R.C. 4123.57(A) compensation. State, ex rel. Johnson, v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 384, 533 N.E. 2d 775, syllabus; State, ex rel. Apgar, v. Indus. Comm. (1989), 42 Ohio St. 3d 5, 535 N.E. 2d 1364. Appellant submitted no such evidence here, claiming that such proof is unnecessary since the ten-percent permanent partial disability determination entitles her as of right to compensation for impaired earning capacity, the amount of which is to be computed using the ten-percent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Apgar v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Bittinger v. NACCO Mining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API