Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Loral Systems Group v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1991No. 89-1050Published

1DissentDouglas, J.

I dissented in State, ex rel. Bittinger, v. NACCO Mining Co. (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 30, 550 N.E. 2d 172; State, ex rel. Apgar, v. Indus. Comm. (1989), 42 Ohio St. 3d 5, 535 N.E. 2d 1364; and State, ex rel. Johnson, v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 384, 533 N.E. 2d 775. I also dissent from today’s majority opinion. I write separately for the *114purpose of making the following observations.

The statute applicable in the case at bar is former R.C. 4123.57 (see Am. Sub. H.B. No. 138, 138 Ohio Laws, Part 1,1727,1733), which was substantially amended in 1986. See Am. Sub. S.B. No. 307, 141 Ohio…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Apgar v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Bittinger v. NACCO Mining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API