Legal Opinion

State ex rel. CPC Group v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1990No. 89-963PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

Two questions are posed by the commission’s order: (1) Is there an unqualified right to R.C. 4123.57(A) compensation once partial disability has been determined? and (2) Is retirement irrelevant to a determination of an impaired earning capacity? For the reasons to follow, we answer both questions in the negative and affirm the appellate court judgment.

The first inquiry is quickly disposed of based on State, ex rel. Johnson, v. Indus. Comm., supra, which stated that a claimant did not have an automatic right to receive R.C. 4123.57(A) compensation. Under Johnson, an R.C. 4123.57(A) deter*210minati…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. CommOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Volan v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Indus.Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API