State ex rel. Pauley v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Upon review of the *264record, we find that the court of appeals erred in granting a limited writ of mandamus.
At the time the court of appeals decided this case, it did not have the benefit of recent rulings by this court on the question of impairment of earning capacity under former R.C. 4123.57(A). In the syllabus of State, ex rel. Johnson, v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 384, 533 N.E. 2d 775, we stated that when a “claimant elects to receive compensation under R.C. 4123.57(A), proof of actual impairment of earning capacity must be presented to support an award of weekly compensation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. CPC Group v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Industrial Commission v. RoyerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Apgar v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Bittinger v. NACCO Mining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by25 opinions
- State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Mount Carmel Health v. ForteOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Evenflo Juvenile Furniture Co. v. HinkleOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. McEndree v. Consolidation Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Gool v. Owens Illinois, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.