Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1988No. 88-158PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The determinative question before this court is whether a claimant has an absolute right to receive benefits under R.C. 4123.57(A) based upon a prior determination of the percentage of a claimant’s partial disability. For the reasons that follow, we hold that a claimant does not have such an absolute right to receive compensation under Section (A), and therefore we reverse the court of appeals.

The version of R.C. 4123.57 in effect on the date of appellee’s injury,1 provided in relevant part:

*386“Partial disability compensation shall be paid as follows, provided, that an employee may elect as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Latino v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State ex rel. Meeks v. Ohio Brass Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Industrial Commission v. RoyerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Hammond v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Combs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Simpson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Apgar v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API