Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa Barbara

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 12834PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment declaring the rights of the respective parties in and to waters of Santa Ynez River and denying the application of the plaintiffs for an injunction.

The Santa Ynez River is an innavigable stream having its source on the northerly and westerly slopes of the Santa Ynez and San Rafael Mountains in Santa Barbara County, and flows in a general westerly direction for a distance of about 100 miles to the Pacific Ocean.

The plaintiffs are the owners of lands within the bed and bordering upon the Santa Ynez River and its tributaries. The defendants are…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API