Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Kittinger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1905No. 5588PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered November 17, 1904, reviving a judgment, upon motion of the judgment creditor.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On March 12, 1892, George W. Fischer and James Feid Macdonald, then copartners as “Fischer & Macdonald, recovered a judgment in the superior court of King county, against the appellant, for the sum of $2,331.31 and costs of action. Subsequently the judgment was, for a valuable consideration, assigned to the respondents. In the early part of the year 1898, the respondents brought a common law action against the appellant upon the judg-. ment, and on May 18, of that year, recovered against him for $3,908.31, being the amount of the earlier judgment, with interest and costs of action added. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. LabereeWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Raught v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Howard v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Denio v. BenhamWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meikle v. CloquetWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. v. DonofrioWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State Ex rel. Conner v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Kelleher v. WellsWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Foley v. KelleherWashington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API