Legal Opinion

Meikle v. Cloquet

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1906No. 6300PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Rice, J., entered April 5, 1906, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action upon a judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On June 12, 1899, the appellant, Meikle, recovered a judgment for the sum of $699.62 against the respondent August Cloquet, Sr., in the superior court of Lewis county, on a promissory note executed sometime in 1894. At the date of the judgment August Cloquet was a married man, and was then living with his wife on certain real property situated in Lewis county on which they had theretofore filed a declaration of homestead. The real property at the time of the entry of judgment was of the probable value of $5,000. The parties also owned certain personal property, which was appraised later at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palmer v. LabereeWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Bettman v. CowleyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Smalley v. LaugenourWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Atwood v. AtwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Fischer v. KittingerWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Crowe & Co. v. Adkinson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Barouh v. IsraelWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. v. DonofrioWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Ball v. BussellWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Johnson v. Great Northern Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API