Legal Opinion

Howard v. Ross

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1905No. 5388PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Belt, J., entered March 1, 1904, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court, a jury being waived, in an action upon a judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtChow, J.

This action was commenced by respondent to recover on a judgment for $7,313.63, costs and interest, entered in respondent’s favor against appellant, in the superior court of Spokane county, Washington, on June 15, 1898. Judgment having been recovered thereon by respondent, Henry Howard, this appeal has been taken.

As above indicated, the original judgment now pleaded as a cause of action was recovered June 15, 1898, after the enactment of the law of 1897 relative to the. duration of judgments. Bal. Code, § 5148, et seq. It is an admitted fact that the judgment of June 15, 1898, was recovered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  2. McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Brine v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Palmer v. LabereeWashington Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. v. DonofrioWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Fischer v. KittingerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Kelleher v. WellsWashington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API