Legal Opinion

Denio v. Benham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1901No. 3594PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pacific County. — Hon. Henby S. Elliott, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, J.

This is an appeal from an order reviving a judgment entered in a proceeding had pursuant to §§ 462, 463 of 2 Hill’s Code. The principal contention of the appellant is that these sections of the Code were repealed by the act of March 6, 1897 (Session Laws 1897, p, 52), and hence there is no method of continu*486ing the life of a judgment beyond the statutory period of limitation other than by a common-law action upon the judgment. Since this appeal was taken, this court has met and decided this question adversely to the appellant’s contention…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palmer v. LabereeWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. v. DonofrioWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Fischer v. KittingerWashington Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API