United States v. Horstmann Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
Merchandise consisting of brass saber chains, nickel plated, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of Philadelphia, as chains designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about the person, at 80 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1428 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:
Par. 1428. * * * and articles valued above 20 cents per dozen- pieces, designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, such as and including buckles, cardcases, chains, cigar cases, cigar cutters, cigar holders, cigarette eases, cigarette…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. KressCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Hensel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Rumpp v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. SussfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- N. S. Meyer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- M. Pressner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- United States v. Gaunt & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Dale Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- United States v. Kastor & Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.