Legal Opinion

United States v. Kastor & Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 7, 1927No. 2884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Among a great number of items in several entries the classification of item 5099, invoiced as key chains, is the only one in dispute here. This item consists of a number of cards containing six key chains, each of which chains is made of metal, about 16 inches in length, less than five-sixteenths of an inch in diameter, with a spring hook or snap at one end and a piece of leather attached permanently to the other end, which leather contains a buttonhole resembling the leather end usually found on suspenders where they are attached to trouser buttons.

The testimony shows that they are sold to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. United States v. Horstmann Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. KressCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Rumpp v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. United States v. SussfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. United States v. R. J. Saunders & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Forstner Chain Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API