Legal Opinion

M. Pressner & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 24, 1956No. C. D. 1784PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case relates to merchandise, described on the invoice as “Metal (Tin) Dime Saving Bank,” which was classified under the provision in paragraph 1527 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 for:

Articles valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces, designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, such as and including buckles, cardcases, chains, cigar cases, cigar cutters, cigar holders, cigar lighters, cigarette cases, cigarette holders, coin holders, collar, cuff, and dress buttons, combs, match boxes, mesh bags and purses, millinery, military and hair…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. United States v. Horstmann Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. Ellis Silver Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dan Brechner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. I. B. Cohen & Sons Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Isaac B. Cohen & Sons Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Isaac B. Cohen & Sons Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. J. R. Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API