Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1915No. 1491PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7625 (T. D. 34870).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case consists of so-called “pro-repel” lead pencils, meaning that the lead is held by a small cylinder which slides in and out at the end of a larger cylinder or barrel. The pencils are composed entirely of base metal, except that some of them have imitation precions stones set in their top ends.

The collector hold that the pencils in question “were designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, composed wholly or in chief value of metal, valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces.” The collector therefore assessed the same with…

2Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. Horstmann Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. M. Pressner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. United States v. Gaunt & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. Hensel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  5. United States v. SussfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API