Rumpp v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
' Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstracts 38550, 38760, and 38765.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Fittings for leather bags, dressing cases, manicure cases, and other leather cases and boxes imported by C. F. Rumpp & Sons, Langfeld Bros., Dingelstedt & Co., and John Wanamaker, were classified by the collectors of customs as articles composed of metal valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces and designed to be worn on the apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, and were accordingly assessed for duty at 60 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 356 of the tariff act of 1913 which reads as follows:
356. * * * Articles valued at above 20 cents per dozen pieces…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sussfeld, Lorsch & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Horstmann Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. KressCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Lionel Trading Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Kastor & Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Andrews & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.