Legal Opinion

United States v. Kress

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 4, 1925No. 2507PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Heavy steel key rings attached to steel snap hooks having leather loops, imported at the port of New York, and valued at more than 20 cents per dozen pieces, were classified by the collector as articles designed to be carried on or about or attached to the person and were accordingly assessed for duty at 80 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1428 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

1428. * * * articles valued above 20 cents per-dozen pieces, designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, such as and including buckles, card cases,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rumpp v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. United States v. Wittnauer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Sussfeld, Lorsch & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Schoverling v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Horstmann Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. Gaunt & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. ChichesterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. Kastor & Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API