Legal Opinion

Foster v. Irwin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 2000No. CV-99-0002-PRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether a defendant convicted of possession of drugs for personal use is ineligible for mandatory probation under A.R.S. § 13-901.01 either because of a prior non-violent, non-drug-related felony conviction or because the trial judge believed that the defendant actually possessed the drugs for sale. We hold that the trial judge erred in sentencing the defendant to prison. We thus remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 In 1998, Daniel Alex Foster was charged with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Goddard v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. Gray v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Haney v. EymanArizona Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. ChristianArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. ThuesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. State v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. PereyraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API