Legal Opinion

State v. Joyner

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 31, 2007No. 2 CA-CR 2006-0032PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Judge.

¶ 1 A jury found Ramon Joyner guilty of possession of a narcotic drug, possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting arrest. It also found that he had prior convictions for armed robbery and attempted armed robbery. He was sentenced to a mitigated, enhanced, eight-year term of imprisonment for possession of a narcotic drug and presumptive, enhanced, 3.75-year terms of imprisonment for each of the other convictions, all to be served concurrently.

¶2 On appeal, Joyner maintains his sentences for the possession convictions are illegal. He argues…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki KasicCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State v. LewandowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State of Arizona v. Joel Agustin LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. State of Arizona v. Bryan Peter FoshayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API