Legal Opinion

Goddard v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 10, 1998No. 1 CA-SA 97-0378PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FIDEL, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Does Proposition 200 mandate probation for a person convicted of possession of a narcotic drug when the person has been convicted of two prior offenses of possession of narcotic drugs for sale? That question is presented in this special action. We accept jurisdiction because the question is one of first impression, of statewide importance, and likely to recur. See Snow v. Superior Court, 183 Ariz. 320, 322, 903 P.2d 628, 630 (App.1995). We hold that probation is not required.

¶2 On November 19, 1997, Petitioner Cicero Goddard pled guilty to possession of narcotic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. State v. OehlerkingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Snow v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. State v. OssanaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Foster v. IrwinArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gray v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. State v. EstradaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API