State v. Christian
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Justice.
¶ 1 The narrow issue we must decide in this matter is whether a defendant’s prior felony conviction for possession of narcotic drugs below the statutory threshold amount can be used as a historical prior felony conviction to enhance the sentence of a subsequent felony offense. The trial court ruled that it could not. The court of appeals, in a split decision, reversed the trial court. Agreeing with the majority of the court of appeals, we hold that a prior conviction for possession of narcotic drugs in an amount below the statutory threshold can be used to enhance the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- David Stambaugh v. Mark KillianArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SepahiArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court · 2016
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.