Legal Opinion

State v. Pereyra

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 6, 2001No. 1 CA-CR 99-0809PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.'

¶ 1 In 1996, the Arizona electorate adopted Proposition 200, codified as A.R.S. § 13-901.01, requiring suspension of sentence, imposition of probation, and treatment for certain crimes entailing possession of drugs for personal use. The question presented in this appeal is whether § 13-901.01 applies to the possession of a narcotic drug for personal use within a drug free school zone. Answering that question in the affirmative, we remand to the trial court for resentencing.

Background

¶ 2 While executing a search warrant, police officers discovered heroin and drug…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. DeddensArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. AultArizona Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wozniak v. GalatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. BrainCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. State of Arizona v. Linda Ann SiplivyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API