State v. Pereyra
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.'
¶ 1 In 1996, the Arizona electorate adopted Proposition 200, codified as A.R.S. § 13-901.01, requiring suspension of sentence, imposition of probation, and treatment for certain crimes entailing possession of drugs for personal use. The question presented in this appeal is whether § 13-901.01 applies to the possession of a narcotic drug for personal use within a drug free school zone. Answering that question in the affirmative, we remand to the trial court for resentencing.
Background
¶ 2 While executing a search warrant, police officers discovered heroin and drug…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. DeddensArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. AultArizona Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Wozniak v. GalatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. BrainCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State of Arizona v. Linda Ann SiplivyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.