Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage District
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
The Buckeye Irrigation Company, a corporation, is now and long has been the owner of an irrigation system, consisting of diversion works in the Gila River below the month of the Agua Pria and a canal system extending in a general westerly direction therefrom.
For many years some 16,000 acres of land have been irrigated from this canal. Under the articles of incorporation of the Company, each shareholder must own an acre of land for every share of stock he holds, and the stock is inseparably attached to the particular land served.
In the year 1922, a number of the stockholders desired to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thaanum v. Bynum Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Slosser v. Salt River Valley Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1901
- Stimson v. Alessandro Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Rialto Irr. Dist. v. StowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Johnson v. ChandlerArizona Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Belle Fourche Pipeline Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Solana Land Co. v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Mueller v. HoblynWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Taylor v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.