Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1951No. 5209PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Justice.

After the court handed down its written opinion in this case, reported in 71 Ariz. 254, 226 P.2d 154, a motion for a rehearing was granted. At this time various political subdivisions of the state filed a petition for leave to file briefs amici curise, which petition was duly granted. Brief of amici curise was filed in support of appellee’s motion for rehearing.

On reconsideration of the case from the various contentions set forth, we are of the opinion that our former opinion correctly disposed of the case. We adhere to the rule announced therein that the Roosevelt…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Salladay v. Old Dominion Copper Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. SharpArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. The City of Phoenix v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. City of Phoenix v. WeedonArizona Supreme Court · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Roberson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Conant v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API