Slosser v. Salt River Valley Canal Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
The facts presented by the record are as follows : The Salt River Valley Canal Company is a corporation organized under the General Incorporation Act of the territory, and its articles bear date the sixth day of September, 1875. The articles recite that: “We, the undersigned, being desirous of forming a corporation for the purpose of supplying a portion of the valley lying upon the north side of the-Salt River, and in the vicinity of the town of Phoenix, with water for irrigation and for milling, manufacturing, and mechanical purposes, under and in pursuance of the laws of' the territory of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Combs v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Ontario Bank v. BunnellNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Inhabitants of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
3Cited by25 opinions
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re Water Rights of Deschutes RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. ChewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Stewart v. Verde River Irrigation & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1937
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.