Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Chandler
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1922No. Civil No. 2073PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
The statement of the case by the appellant, and his assignments of error, are as follows :
“This is a proceeding brought by the board of directors of the Auxiliary Eastern Canal Irrigation District under the provisions of section 28 of chapter 149, Laws of 1921, to obtain a judicial determination as to the legality of the organization of the district and the regularity and legality of the proceedings of the board of directors of said district providing for and authorizing the issue and sale of the first series of $2,000,000 of 7 per cent bonds of said district.
“An answer was filed to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Turlock Irrigation District v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Brewster v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Home Accident Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Brown v. Electrical District No. TwoArizona Supreme Court · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.