Rialto Irr. Dist. v. Stowell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error and Cross-Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California; Olin Wellborn, Judge. Action by N. W. Stowell against the ’Rialto Irrigation District, a corporation. There was a judgment denying plaintiff part of the relief sought, and defendant brings error, and plaintiff sues out a cross-writ of error.
Read the full summary
In Error and Cross-Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California; Olin Wellborn, Judge. Action by N. W. Stowell against the ’Rialto Irrigation District, a corporation. There was a judgment denying plaintiff part of the relief sought, and defendant brings error, and plaintiff sues out a cross-writ of error. The plaintiff in error was incorporated under an act of the state of California commonly called the Wright Act, entitled “An act to provide for the organization and government of irrigation districts, and to provide for the…
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). In form the bonds were “promises to pay to the bearer” thereof:
“At the office of the treasurer of said district the sum of ($500.00) five hundred dollars in gold coin of the United States, at the dates and upon installments as follows: At the expiration of eleven years from date five (5) per cent, of said sum; at the expiration of twelve years from date six (6) per cent, of said sum; at the expiration of thirteen years from date seven (7) per cent, of said sum; at the expiration of fourteen years from date eight (8) per cent, of said sum; at the expiration…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Marsh v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- McClure v. Township of OxfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. County of ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. Fort ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- State ex rel. Clancy v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Noble v. Yancey.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Little v. Emmett Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.