Legal Opinion

Thaanum v. Bynum Irrigation District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1925No. 5,632PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

In 1906 the Teton Co-operative Reservoir Company, a corporation, was organized -under the laws of this state, and ever since has maintained its corporate existence. Its capital is represented by 1,000' shares of stock, and under its by-laws the owners of a share of this stock is entitled “to the use during the irrigating season of each year, of a one-thousandth part of the waters, water rights and irrigating facilities and systems of this company, including the right to lease, pledge, sell and dispose of such use.” The company constructed a reservoir in which it impounds a large quantity of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hersey v. NeilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Martien v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Sanders CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Page v. New York Realty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Helena Light & Railway Co. v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Haman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mattson v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State Ex Rel. Brooks v. CookMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1925

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API