Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Bayly Brothers, Inc., Harold Bayly, Roy D. Bayly, Edwards & Wildey Company, Suburban Estates, Inc., and California Trust Company have appealed from a judgment by which they were held liable for the amount paid by the plaintiffs for a beneficial interest under a certain declaration of trust which" was issued and sold without a permit from the commissioner of corporations. The plaintiffs also are dissatisfied with the judgment, and upon their appeal claim interest in a larger sum than was allowed.
The controversy arose out of a real estate subdivision project initiated by Bayly…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Bowden v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.