Legal Opinion
Northpointe Plaza v. City of Rochester
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 22, 1991No. C3-89-1851PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
This case comes before us on an appeal from a decision of the court of appeals which affirmed a trial court decision denying appellant damages allegedly suffered by appellant when the City of Rochester denied a conditional use permit (CUP) for its property. Appellant’s action was based on an alleged violation by the city of appellant’s due process rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We affirm both the trial court and the court of appeals.
A brief statement of facts is necessary. On June 24,1985, appellant, Northgate Plaza, a partnership consisting of Jon Fin-strom and John Klopp,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Creative Environments, Inc. v. Robert EstabrookCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Scott v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bituminous Materials, Inc. v. Rice County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational ChurchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.