Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service Board
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 14, 1948No. 34,619PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Mandamus to compel relator’s reinstatement to a civil service position.
Respondents King, Schmahl, and Driscoll are executive officers of the state. They had no part in classifying relator’s position' or allocating him to any position and are not concerned in any of the questions here raised. Apparently, they were joined as parties to make the judgment binding on them, because they have fiscal duties to perform in connection with the payment of salaries of public employes. The issues here arise out of the controversy between relator and the civil service authorities, and the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. BONGARDS CO-OPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.