Legal Opinion

In Re Stadsvold

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 2008No. A06-1696PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

754 N.W.2d 323 (2008)

In re the Matter of the Decision of County of Otter Tail Board of Adjustment to Deny a Variance to Cyril STADSVOLD and Cynara Stadsvold.

No. A06-1696.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 19, 2008.

Rehearing Denied August 1, 2008.

Nathan L. Seeger, Nathan L. Seeger Law Office, Fergus Falls, MN, for Appellant.

Michael T. Rengel Pemberton, Sorlie, Rufer & Kershner, P.L.L.P., Fergus Falls, MN, for Respondent.

Scott R. Simmons, St. Paul, MN, for Amicus Curiae Association of Minnesota Counties.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This case arises from…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. MATTER OF SASSO v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dahlin v. KroeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. KRUMMENACHER v. City of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining MaoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. 328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Johnson v. Cook CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API