Legal Opinion

Flagstad v. City of San Mateo

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1957No. Civ. 17311PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Defendants Regan and General Petroleum Corporation, as lessor and lessee, applied for a zoning variance permitting construction and operation of a service station. After a tie vote in the city planning commission, the application was heard by the city council, which granted the variance in modified form. Plaintiff, owner of adjoining property, brought this action seeking writ of mandate or of review. Upon return to the alternative writ and after full hearing, the trial court issued writ of mandate invalidating the grant of variance and directing further hearing by the city council. Defendants…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Bailey v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Rubin v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Cantrell v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Candlestick Properties, Inc. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Jenner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Bringle v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API