Legal Opinion

Papac v. City of Montesano

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1956No. 33531PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The plaintiff recovered judgment in the trial court in the amount of three thousand dollars, the court having found that the defendant city had taken her property for public use and was maintaining a nuisance thereon, causing damage to her house. The city has appealed, assigning error to all of the material findings and conclusions.

The testimony showed that the home now owned by the plaintiff was built in the year 1911 over a gully or ravine, which is the east branch of Sylvia creek and is a natural drainage for certain portions of the city of Montesano. In the year 1913, the city of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Harkoff v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Sigurdson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Gillam v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Colella v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Farber v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Barci v. Intalco Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API