Legal Opinion

Harkoff v. Whatcom County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1952No. 31896PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was originally instituted by John Harkoff, Jr., against Whatcom county to recover a judgment for damages arising out of injury to his property as a result of flooding by the overflow of water from a roadside ditch maintained by the county. The other respondents claiming to suffer like damage intervened. The court awarded damages and injunctive relief.

The properties of respondents are located in an area referred to as a watershed. This area commences north of the Canadian line, is several miles in width, and the drainage is southerly and southwesterly. Much of the natural drainage…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ghione v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Wendel v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Armstrong v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Pepper v. J.J. Welcome Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. Colella v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Phillips v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. Gaines v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Anderson v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API