Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1918No. 14266PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered March 17, 1917, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs, Jacobs and wife, seek recovery of compensation for damage to their real property, caused and to be caused by the defendant, city of Seattle, in the exercise of its power of eminent domain, the amount of which compensation had not been in any manner ascertained or determined prior to *525the commencement of this action. Trial in the superior court for King county sitting with a jury resulted in verdict and judgment awarding the plaintiffs compensation in the sum of $1,000, from which the city has appealed to this court.

This is the second appeal of this case to this court. The first…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Great Falls Manufacturing Co. v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Stenberg v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API