Legal Opinion

Barci v. Intalco Aluminum Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 3, 1974No. 1790-1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

The plaintiffs, Paul G. Barci and Paul N. Barci, are father and son. They have owned and operated farm property near Ferndale, Washington, since the early part of the century. The defendant, Intalco Aluminum Company, constructed and commenced the operation of its aluminum reduction plant near the plaintiffs’ property in 1966. The plaintiffs brought suit for damages to their real property, to their cattle and to themselves individually, caused by pollutants from the plant. Liability was admitted by the defendant leaving the amount of damages as the sole issue to be decided by the jury.

The jury…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Gerberg v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. The B. F. Goodrich Tire Company v. E. H. LysterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. Evans v. Reading Chemical Fertilizing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Dorsey v. Academy Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rice v. JanovichWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Pepper v. J.J. Welcome Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API